Why Safety Cases Should Compile Like Software

Akshay Chalana
Akshay Chalana May 21, 2026

Opening

Software engineering solved many scaling problems through:

  • reproducible builds
  • dependency graphs
  • CI pipelines
  • deterministic compilation
  • invalidation logic

Safety engineering still largely operates through manually synchronized documents.

Core Thesis

Safety cases should behave more like compiled system state than static documents.

What Compilation Means for Assurance

A modern safety pipeline should:

  • ingest source artifacts
  • propagate changes automatically
  • identify invalidated evidence
  • regenerate impacted sections
  • maintain dependency awareness

Examples

A timing change in braking software should automatically flag:

  • affected TSRs
  • latency assumptions
  • invalidated tests
  • impacted safety arguments
  • stale verification evidence

Why Static Traceability Breaks

Static matrices become stale immediately after:

  • software updates
  • architecture changes
  • requirement revisions
  • supplier modifications

The Build-System Analogy

Source code → compiled binary Engineering artifacts → compiled assurance state

Continuous Compilation

The future safety case:

  • continuously rebuilds
  • continuously propagates changes
  • continuously surfaces stale assumptions

Closing

The goal is not automated sign-off. The goal is continuously synchronized engineering truth.

Book a Call