Use cases
Each workflow begins with real system evidence and ends with an expert-reviewed decision the team can trace.
Turn system context and observed failures into inspectable failure modes, causes, effects, and mitigations.
Explore workflowMove from architecture to attack paths, risk decisions, cybersecurity goals, and traceable requirements.
Explore workflowKeep analyses, mitigations, requirements, tests, and evidence current as the system evolves.
Explore workflowConnect Task FMEA, simulation, software-in-the-loop, and runtime evidence to named deployment failures.
Explore workflowPatterns from deployed work
Broad, anonymized examples drawn from real engineering programs. No customer, product, or sector-specific details are exposed.
Turn architectures into reusable FMEAs and modular safety arguments, then preserve the links between hazards, controls, requirements, and verification across variants.
Cluster hazards around the control that resolves them, filter the graph by the reviewer’s question, and export the complete evidence set in the format the expert already expects.
Carry accepted reasoning into the next program while showing what changed, what still applies, and which evidence must be regenerated.
